Legal Validity of an Arbitrator’s Award Under the Arbitration Act, 1940

Learning and Resources
,
1

This article explores the legal validity of an arbitrator’s award under the Arbitration Act, 1940, in Pakistan, covering key legal aspects, relevant case laws, and the conditions for its enforcement and challenges.

Understanding Arbitration Awards

An arbitrator’s award is a decision made by a neutral third party (arbitrator) appointed to resolve a dispute outside the court system. Under the Arbitration Act, 1940, an award has specific legal implications and requirements to be considered valid and enforceable.

Key Requirements for a Valid Arbitrator’s Award

  1. Written and Signed Award:
  • The award must be in writing and signed by the arbitrator(s) or umpire, as stipulated in The Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 14.
  1. Notice to Parties:
  • After making and signing the award, the arbitrator must provide written notice to the parties involved. According to The Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 14, this notice should include the making and signing of the award, as well as the fees and charges payable.
  1. Filing in Court:
  • At the request of any party, the arbitrator must file the award (or a signed copy) in the court, along with depositions and documents. The court then notifies the parties of the award’s filing, as per The Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 14.
  1. Jurisdiction:
  • The award should be filed in a court that has jurisdiction over the matter to which the reference relates, as defined in The Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 31.

Legal Challenges and Validity

  1. Challenging the Award:
  • Parties can challenge the existence or validity of an arbitration agreement or award by applying to the court, as per The Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 33.
  1. Grounds for Setting Aside an Award:
  • An award can be set aside on grounds such as misconduct by the arbitrator, improper procurement of the award, or the arbitrator exceeding their jurisdiction. These grounds are often evaluated under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.
  • In Faisalabad Development Authority and another Versus Messrs Orient Associates, Architects and Contractors (Pvt.) Limited, Faisalabad, 2013 CLD 871, the court observed that an award should only be made a rule of the court if it sees no cause to set it aside or remit it.
  • In Raja KARAM DAD KHAN Versus FAIZ AHMAD through Special Attorney and others, 2017 CLC 1720, the court emphasized the award proceedings can be flawed due to the appointment of only one arbitrator whereas it was earlier agreed upon that two arbitrators should have been appointed.
  • In INJUM AQEEL Versus LATIF MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY and others, 2023 SCMR 1361, the court emphasized that merely filing an objection under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, is insufficient without substantial grounds for setting aside the award.
  1. Limitations:
  • Section 37 of THE ARBITRATION ACT, 1940 states that The Limitation Act, 1908 shall apply to arbitrat ions as they apply to proceedings in Court.

Enforcement and Legal Effect

  1. Making the Award a Rule of the Court:
  • If no valid objections are raised or the court dismisses any objections, the court makes the award a rule of the court, leading to a decree in accordance with the award, as per Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.
  1. Finality of the Award:
  • Once the award is made a rule of the court, it becomes final and binding on the parties, with limited grounds for appeal.
  1. Res Judicata:
  • An arbitration award acquires legal effect only when it is made a rule of court. If an application to make the award a rule of court is rejected, the award cannot bar subsequent legal proceedings on the same cause of action, provided the suit is within the prescribed limitation period, as held in Abdul Hussain Shall v. Allah Ditta, PLD 2009 Lahore 442.
  • In Province of Punjab v. Messrs Sher Muhammad & Co., 2001 CLC 613, the court held that appointing arbitrators without the consent of all parties, especially when a suit is pending, is a violation of Section 21 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and that an illegal appointment shall render the award a nullity.

Case Laws and Legal Perspectives

  1. Oral Agreements:
  • The law necessitates that an arbitration agreement be in writing, as clarified in NAZIR AHMAD and others v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and others, PLD 2021 Lahore 398.
  1. Filing of Award:
  • In CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (CDA) through Chairman CDA, Headquarter, Islamabad and another Versus Messrs HABIB RAFIQ (PVT.) LTD. and others, 2021 SCMR 1137, the Supreme Court held that an arbitrator can file the award at the request of a party, resolving disputes related to the filing process.
  1. Role of Umpire:
  • In EBRAHIM AHMED‑Plaintiff versus SIND HOSIERY & TEXTILE MILLS‑Defendant, PLD 1952 Sind 52, the court held that the appointment of an Umpire within one month of the arbitrators’ appointment is mandatory under the Arbitration Act of 1940.
  1. Consensus ad idem, Estoppel:
  • In Mst. AKHTAR BASHIR v. MUHAMMAD BASHIR AND ANOTHER, 1981 CLC 423, the parties were estopped from questioning the validity of the award in such a case.
  1. Error of law apparent on face of award
  • In Trading Corporation of Pakistan LTD., Karachi v Messrs Al-Ehsan Trading Co, 1981 CLC 999, the court held that even if the award on the question of damages was erroneous, it did not constitute an error of law apparent on the face of the award that would justify setting it aside

Conclusion

The legal validity of an arbitrator’s award under the Arbitration Act, 1940, hinges on strict compliance with the Act’s provisions. The award must be written, signed, duly notified, and filed in the appropriate court. Challenges to the award can be made, but the grounds are limited to ensure the arbitration process’s integrity. Once validated by the court, the award is final and binding. This framework ensures that arbitration remains a credible and effective method for resolving disputes outside traditional litigation.