ملزم کو قانونی مشورہ لینے کی ضرورت ہے۔ وہ اپنی دفاعی حکمت عملی پر غور کرے، جیسے کہ اس کے خلاف جھوٹی شکایت کی بنیاد پر ثبوت فراہم کرنا، اور اپیل دائر کرنے کے لیے وکیل کی مدد لے تاکہ جیل کی سزا کم یا ضمانت حاصل کی جا سکے۔ 4o mini

Public Legal Queries
1

Question:

ایک مرد کو ایک خاتون نے جسمانی تعلق کے لیے راغب کیا۔ یہ عمل باہمی رضامندی سے ہوا، لیکن بعد میں لڑکی نے اُس کے خلاف تعزیراتِ پاکستان کی دفعہ 376 (زیادتی) کے تحت ایف آئی آر درج کروا دی۔ میڈیکل رپورٹ کے مطابق لڑکی کے جسم پر کسی قسم کی مزاحمت کے نشانات نہیں پائے گئے اور پردہ بکارت پر پرانا زخم تھا۔ تاہم، فرانزک رپورٹ میں لڑکی کی شلوار پر منی کے دھبے پائے گئے جو کہ ملزم کے ڈی این اے سے مطابقت رکھتے ہیں۔ اب لڑکی عدالت میں پیش نہیں ہو رہی اور ملزم سے 25 لاکھ روپے کا مطالبہ کر رہی ہے۔

ملزم، جو کہ ایک عام اور سادہ پس منظر سے تعلق رکھتا ہے، اس وقت جیل کی حراست میں ہے اور اُس کی ضمانت ہائی کورٹ مسترد ہو چکی ہے۔

اب وہ کیا کرے؟

Answer:

In light of the scenario presented, where a man is accused of rape (The_Pakistan_Penal_Code, 376) after engaging in consensual relations, and the case involves conflicting medical and forensic evidence, the path forward requires careful consideration of legal strategies and available remedies.

Case Assessment

  1. Evidentiary Conflicts: The absence of struggle marks and the presence of an old tear in the hymen, along with DNA evidence, present a mixed picture. The DNA match could be explained by consensual relations, but the prosecution will likely argue it as proof of the alleged rape.
  2. Complainant’s Conduct: The complainant’s failure to appear in court and demand for money significantly undermine her credibility. This behavior suggests potential blackmail or coercion, which could be used to challenge her allegations.
  3. Legal Position of Accused: The accused is currently in jail with bail denied by the High Court. His ordinary background suggests limited resources, making it difficult to mount a strong defense.

Legal Strategy and Options

  1. Appeal to the Supreme Court: Given the denial of bail by the High Court, the next step is to file a petition for leave to appeal in the Supreme Court of Pakistan. The appeal should focus on the evidentiary conflicts, the complainant’s dubious conduct, and the lack of a fair trial.
  2. Focus on Consent: Emphasize that the relations were consensual.
  • IMRAN Versus The STATE, 2016 PCrLJ 1888, differentiates between ‘will’ and ‘consent’, stating that both are essential for an act to not be considered rape.
  • The defense must argue that the DNA evidence, while present, does not negate the possibility of consent.
  1. Challenge Complainant’s Credibility: Highlight that the complainant was blackmailing the accused as the FIR contains false allegations.
  2. Seek Legal Aid: Given the accused’s limited resources, seek assistance from legal aid organizations or pro bono lawyers to ensure adequate representation.

Relevant Legal Principles and Judgments

  1. Benefit of the Doubt: The accused is entitled to the benefit of the doubt. If the evidence is contradictory or the prosecution fails to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, the accused must be acquitted (Rustam v. The State, 2013 YLR 2600).
  2. Importance of Corroboration: Muhammad Khan v. The State, 2020 PCRLJ 10, underscores the importance of corroborating evidence in rape cases. The court held that the victim’s testimony must be confidence-inspiring and supported by strong evidence.
  3. Impact of Delayed FIR: Delays in filing the FIR can impact the credibility of the prosecution’s case (Muhammad Khan v. The State, 2020 PCRLJ 10).
  4. Role of DNA Evidence: While DNA evidence is significant, it must be considered in conjunction with other evidence to determine the accused’s guilt or innocence (IDREES MASIH Versus The STATE, 2022 YLR 40).
  • The court, in IDREES MASIH Versus The STATE, 2022 YLR 40, emphasized the necessity of DNA testing and semen matching for conclusive proof.
  1. Victim’s Testimony: The victim’s testimony holds significant weight, but inconsistencies can undermine the prosecution’s case (WAHEED MURAD alias SHEIKHA Versus THE STATE, 2012 PCr.L J 437).

Procedural Steps

  1. File Petition in Supreme Court: Prepare and file a petition for leave to appeal in the Supreme Court, challenging the High Court’s denial of bail.
  2. Gather Evidence: Collect all evidence supporting the defense, including medical reports, forensic analysis, and any communication suggesting blackmail or coercion by the complainant.
  3. Engage Competent Counsel: Hire an experienced criminal lawyer or seek legal aid to represent the accused effectively.

Potential Outcomes

  1. Bail Granted: The Supreme Court may grant bail, considering the evidentiary conflicts and complainant’s conduct.
  2. Acquittal: If the prosecution fails to present a convincing case, the trial court may acquit the accused.
  3. Compromise: Although rape is a non-compoundable offense, a settlement may be reached if the complainant withdraws her allegations.

Additional Considerations

  • Media Management: Given the sensitive nature of the case, manage media exposure to protect the accused’s reputation and ensure a fair trial.
  • Witness Protection: If there are concerns about witness intimidation or tampering, seek court orders for witness protection.

By pursuing these legal strategies and remedies, the accused can navigate the complexities of the case and strive for a just outcome.