PIL is a legal action initiated in a court of law for the enforcement of public interest or general welfare.
It addresses issues affecting a large number of people, ensuring access to justice for marginalized sections of society.
- Legal Basis:
- Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan: Grants the High Courts the power to hear cases related to the enforcement of fundamental rights and public interest issues.
- Judicial activism has expanded the scope of Article 199 to include PILs, allowing courts to take suo motu notice of matters of public importance.
- Pre-Filing Considerations:
- Identify a Genuine Public Cause: Ensure the issue affects the public at large and is not for personal gain or motivated by private interests, as illustrated in Premier Battery Industries Private Limited v. Karachi Water and Sewerage Board.
- Gather Evidence: Collect relevant documents, data, and information supporting the cause.
- Consult a Legal Expert: Seek advice from a lawyer experienced in PIL to assess the merits of the case and ensure compliance with legal requirements.
- Step-by-Step Filing Process:
- Drafting the Petition:
- Include a detailed description of the issue, its impact on the public, and the legal basis for the petition.
- Clearly state the reliefs sought from the court.
- Filing the Petition:
- File the petition in the High Court having jurisdiction over the matter.
- Pay the required court fees, which are nominal for PILs.
- Court Procedures:
- Preliminary Hearing: The court examines the petition to determine its maintainability and the genuineness of the public interest involved.
- Notice to Respondents: If the court finds merit in the petition, notices are issued to the concerned authorities or parties, directing them to file their responses.
- Evidence and Arguments: The court may require additional evidence or clarifications from the parties involved.
- Final Hearing and Judgment: After hearing all parties, the court delivers its judgment, which may include directions to the government or concerned authorities to take corrective actions.
- Important Rules and Guidelines:
- Bona Fide Intention: The petitioner must approach the court with clean hands and without any mala fide intention, as seen in Baz Muhammad Khan v. The SP Chamkani, Peshawar.
- Exhaustion of Alternative Remedies: The court may require the petitioner to exhaust all available alternative remedies before filing a PIL, as mentioned in KAUSAR ALI SHAH Versus REGIONAL POLICE OFFICER and others.
- Public Interest: The issue must genuinely affect the public at large and not be a private dispute disguised as a PIL.
- Notable Case Laws and Examples:
- Shehla Zia v. WAPDA (PLD 1994 SC 693): Landmark case on environmental pollution, setting standards for environmental protection.
- General Secretary, West Pakistan Salt Miners Labour Union v. Director, Industries and Mineral Development, Punjab (1994 SCMR 2061): Addressed the rights of mine workers, highlighting the state’s responsibility to ensure their welfare.
- Muhammad Shabbir Hussain, Advocate Versus Federation of Pakistan: Shortage of petroleum products and declaring the price hike engineered by companies was unlawful.
- Post-Judgment Follow-Up:
- Monitoring Compliance: It is the responsibility of the petitioner and the public to monitor the implementation of the court’s orders.
- Contempt Proceedings: If the concerned authorities fail to comply with the court’s orders, contempt proceedings can be initiated.
- Challenges and Limitations:
- Misuse of PIL: There is a risk of PIL being misused for personal or political purposes.
- Judicial Overreach: Courts must exercise restraint to avoid overstepping their jurisdiction and interfering with the functions of the executive.
- Implementation Issues: Ensuring effective implementation of court orders remains a significant challenge.
- Conclusion:
- Filing a PIL in Pakistan is a powerful tool for enforcing public rights and promoting social justice. To ensure that the PIL is effective and serves its intended purpose, it is the responsibility of the petitioner to act diligently.
Relevant Judgments and Statutes:
- Premier Battery Industries Private Limited v. Karachi Water and Sewerage Board, 2018 SCMR 365: Highlights the need for bona fide intention and genuine public benefit in public interest litigation.
- Baz Muhammad Khan v. The SP Chamkani, Peshawar, 2022 MLD 1517: Addresses the misuse of legal processes, including PIL, for personal disputes.
- KAUSAR ALI SHAH Versus REGIONAL POLICE OFFICER and others, PLD 2020 Peshawar 170: Emphasizes the importance of exhausting alternative remedies before filing a PIL.
- Muhammad Shabbir Hussain, Advocate Versus Federation of Pakistan, 2021 CLC 1726: Concerning the shortage of petroleum products and declaring the price hike engineered by companies was unlawful.
- Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan: Grants the High Courts the power to hear cases related to the enforcement of fundamental rights and public interest issues.